Why Some Faculty Choose Administration

Interest in administrative roles is often held with suspicion by academics. And yet, many high functioning faculty find themselves well-suited to leadership and wonder how they might do more. In fact, academic institutions and disciplines thrive only because of this inclination, however ambivalently held.

Faculty are drawn toward leadership for a variety of reasons.

Making a Difference

“Influence and efficacy, that’s my addiction – knowing that I can get something done.” It’s efficient to be in a role that is mandated to change things, fix problems, respond to needs. Without this mandate, faculty can face significant frustrations as they attempt changes with too few resources or simply cope instead of being able to make change.

Filling an Institutional Need

Sometimes it’s enough just to be asked – or to step in simply because there are no better alternatives. Faculty agree to administrative roles in order to shepherd a specific vision, advocate for a vulnerable population, create a bridge from one steady state to another, be a voice of/for diversity, carry out a difficult but necessary change, and more.

Laying a Foundation

Administrative experience is a significant education about the institution. As such, leadership creates networks that can be used as a foundation for scholarly goals and success.

Leadership as a New Challenge

While research seldom loses its attraction, its methods can become familiar, and the politics and funding landscape can lessen its appeal. For some, effective leadership and the challenges of the university can become the new frontier, drawing on and fostering faculty curiosity and a drive for excellence.

Previous Post
What Changes at Promotion to Full Professor?
Next Post
The Importance of Faculty Transitions

On related topics

The Peculiarities of Academic Leadership, Introduction

Our work with faculty, using the CPI 260® assessment, shows us some of the unique shapes of academic leadership. We use the CPI assessment in much of our leadership-focused coaching with faculty, staff, and higher administration. The 260-question online assessment provides insight about how someone is likely to be viewed by…

The Responsible Faculty

This series of posts describes what we’ve learned about the peculiarities of leadership in academia based on our work with the CPI 260® leadership assessment.  See the introduction to this series for background on this assessment. The last two posts in this series focused on faculty productivity.  Today we’re looking at…

Do Faculty Do Enough for Diversity?

I confess: the title of this blog is playing by the rules of popular media, not academia. It’s meant to stir the pot and attract attention by invoking a whole host of reactionary questions… Should faculty do anything for diversity? If so, why? And what does “for diversity” mean, anyway? What…
keyboard_arrow_up